{"id":494,"date":"2015-03-18T22:00:15","date_gmt":"2015-03-19T02:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/?p=494"},"modified":"2018-06-26T15:45:25","modified_gmt":"2018-06-26T19:45:25","slug":"youve-got-style","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/youve-got-style\/","title":{"rendered":"You&#8217;ve Got Style"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 59\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/5532602242_408e71d74e_z.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-497\" src=\"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/5532602242_408e71d74e_z-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"5532602242_408e71d74e_z\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/5532602242_408e71d74e_z-300x199.jpg 300w, http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/5532602242_408e71d74e_z.jpg 640w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>One of many ways to refine our writing is developing a personal <em>style guide<\/em>. Some employers have a style guide to help ensure consistency and correctness across all departments, but most don\u2019t. That shouldn\u2019t stop you, however, from maintaining your own.<\/p>\n<p>For example, you might have decided you prefer &#8220;email&#8221; to &#8220;e-mail,&#8221; &#8220;adviser&#8221; to &#8220;advisor,&#8221; and &#8220;stamping ground&#8221; to &#8220;stomping ground.&#8221; If you keep a mental or written list of these choices, you\u2019ll save a few seconds of decision-making from time to time and avoid distracting your reader with inconsistencies.<\/p>\n<p>You can also create a style guide for a particular document. Let\u2019s say several members of your department have written sections for a brochure, and you are responsible for editing the copy. Program your antennae to catch inconsistencies like &#8220;health care&#8221; vs. &#8220;healthcare,&#8221; en dashes vs. em dashes, and italic vs. bold headings.<\/p>\n<h2>A key style guide decision \u2013 the serial comma<\/h2>\n<p>Back in elementary school we learned that placing a comma before &#8220;and&#8221; or &#8220;or&#8221; in a series of three or more words or phrases is optional. (The punctuation is called a &#8220;serial comma,&#8221;\u00a0&#8220;Oxford comma,&#8221; or &#8220;Harvard comma.&#8221;) So either of these is correct:<\/p>\n<p><em>We\u2019re looking for a new VP, manager and associate.<\/em> (No comma after &#8220;manager.&#8221;)<br \/>\n<em>We\u2019re looking for a new VP, manager, and associate.<\/em> (Comma after &#8220;manager.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>A fundamental step, therefore, in developing a personal style guide is determining whether you are a serial comma person or not. As you might guess, many writers are oblivious to the issue \u2013 because they&#8217;re correct either way \u2013 so you&#8217;re one up on them by staying consistent.<\/p>\n<h2>Which style is better?<\/h2>\n<p>It&#8217;s your call. \u00a0The &#8220;con&#8221; argument is that you&#8217;re going with the flow because most newspapers, magazines, and books omit the serial comma. The &#8220;pro&#8221; argument is that using the serial comma can eliminate ambiguity in a sentence like the following:<\/p>\n<p><em>The courageous performers at our staff party were Al and Betty, Carol and Drew and Esther.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Hmm. There were three acts, but we don&#8217;t know who performed with whom. Did Drew partner with Carol or Esther? Inserting a serial comma solves the problem:<\/p>\n<p><em>The courageous performers at our staff party were Al and Betty, Carol, and Drew and Esther. <\/em>(Carol was the brave soloist.)<br \/>\n<em>The courageous performers at our staff party were Al and Betty, Carol and Drew, and Esther. <\/em>(Esther was the brave soloist.)<\/p>\n<p>This example illustrates one reason I use the serial comma, but on occasion I need to reword or join the non-serial comma camp:<\/p>\n<p><em>The best presentations were made by Jason, our HR director, and Kate.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Because I use the serial comma, I&#8217;m not being clear about whether Jason is the HR director or the HR director is a different person. Did two people make effective presentations or three? Changing the order or departing from my usual style solves the ambiguity:<\/p>\n<p><em>The best presentations were made by Kate and Jason, our HR director.<\/em> (Two people.)<em><br \/>\n<\/em><em>The best presentations were made by Kate, Jason, and our HR director.<\/em> (Three people.)<br \/>\n<em>The best presentations were made by Jason, our HR director and Kate. <\/em>(Three people \u2013 clear because the serial comma is omitted.)<\/p>\n<h2>Bottom line<\/h2>\n<p>Yes, once in a while the serial comma issue gets sticky, but for the most part adhering to your choice is an easy stride toward consistent style.<\/p>\n<p><em style=\"color: #333333;\">In addition to presenting workshops on writing in the workplace, Norm Friedman is a writer, editor, and writing coach. His\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/writingtips.shtml\"><span style=\"color: #333333;\">100+ Instant Writing Tips<\/span><\/a><em style=\"color: #333333;\">\u00a0is a brief \u201cnon-textbook\u201d to help individuals overcome common writing errors and write with more finesse and impact. Learn more at\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/index.shtml\">http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/index.shtml<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 One of many ways to refine our writing is developing a personal style guide. Some employers have a style guide to help ensure consistency and correctness across all departments, but most don\u2019t. That shouldn\u2019t stop you, however, from maintaining &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/youve-got-style\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,10],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=494"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":509,"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494\/revisions\/509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.normfriedman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}